[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUWOvq4jK-Fs3u+A5FA6UjeFeh=bRmbmxrx_UuHKH7zo9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 12:55:16 +0200
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05g@...il.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Robo Bot <apw@...onical.com>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Jordi Pujol <jordipujolp@...il.com>, ezk@....cs.sunysb.edu,
"mszeredi@...e.cz" <mszeredi@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: Unionmount and overlayfs testsuite
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>>>> [ NOTE-2: The call-trace I have seen once (TERMSLASH=0). ]
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you know for which operation?
>>
>> This still looks like the same annotation problem in
>> generic_file_splice_write() I already sent a patch for.
>>
>> Fix now pushed to overlayfs.v22/overlayfs.current.
>>
>
> Will you send this patch to Al separately or will it go through your tree?
>
> [ Do you happen to know if LTP has some tests especially to test pipes? ]
>
Chris from LTP answered me to test with latest ltp-git [1] (here:
20140422-134-gd458410).
So, I have run IPC/Pipes/Syscalls tests...
# LC_ALL=C ./runltp -f ipc pipes syscalls
Test Start Time: Tue Jun 3 12:48:24 2014
-----------------------------------------
Testcase Result Exit Value
-------- ------ ----------
pipeio_1 PASS 0
pipeio_3 PASS 0
pipeio_4 PASS 0
pipeio_5 PASS 0
pipeio_6 PASS 0
pipeio_8 PASS 0
sem01 PASS 0
sem02 PASS 0
message_queue_test_01 PASS 0
message_queue_test_02_get PASS 0
message_queue_test_02_snd PASS 0
message_queue_test_02_rcv PASS 0
message_queue_test_02_ctl PASS 0
message_queue_test_04 PASS 0
message_queue_test_05 PASS 0
pipe_test_01 PASS 0
pipe_test_02 PASS 0
semaphore_test_01 PASS 0
semaphore_test_02 PASS 0
semaphore_test_03 PASS 0
shmem_test_01 PASS 0
shmem_test_02 PASS 0
shmem_test_03 PASS 0
shmem_test_04 PASS 0
shmem_test_05 PASS 0
shmem_test_06 PASS 0
shmem_test_07 PASS 0
signal_test_01 PASS 0
signal_test_02 PASS 0
signal_test_03 PASS 0
signal_test_04 PASS 0
signal_test_05 PASS 0
signal_test_06 PASS 0
signal_test_07 PASS 0
-----------------------------------------------
Total Tests: 34
Total Failures: 0
Kernel Version: 3.15.0-rc8-2-iniza-lockdep
Machine Architecture: x86_64
Hostname: fambox
So far no LOCKPDEPs in my logs.
- Sedat -
[1] http://marc.info/?l=ltp-list&m=140179189918510&w=2
[2] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/doc/mini-howto-building-ltp-from-git.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists