[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140603115015.GZ11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 13:50:15 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...nel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
dietmar.eggemann@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/16] arm: topology: Define TC2 sched energy and
provide it to scheduler
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 07:16:33PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> +static struct capacity_state cap_states_cluster_a7[] = {
> + /* Cluster only power */
> + { .cap = 358, .power = 2967, }, /* 350 MHz */
> + { .cap = 410, .power = 2792, }, /* 400 MHz */
> + { .cap = 512, .power = 2810, }, /* 500 MHz */
> + { .cap = 614, .power = 2815, }, /* 600 MHz */
> + { .cap = 717, .power = 2919, }, /* 700 MHz */
> + { .cap = 819, .power = 2847, }, /* 800 MHz */
> + { .cap = 922, .power = 3917, }, /* 900 MHz */
> + { .cap = 1024, .power = 4905, }, /* 1000 MHz */
> + };
So one thing I remember was that we spoke about restricting this to
frequency levels where the voltage changed.
Because voltage jumps were the biggest factor to energy usage.
Any word on that?
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists