lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue,  3 Jun 2014 12:38:45 +0100
From:	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
	James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.11 079/138] metag: fix memory barriers

3.11.10.11 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>

commit 2425ce84026c385b73ae72039f90d042d49e0394 upstream.

Volatile access doesn't really imply the compiler barrier. Volatile access
is only ordered with respect to other volatile accesses, it isn't ordered
with respect to general memory accesses. Gcc may reorder memory accesses
around volatile access, as we can see in this simple example (if we
compile it with optimization, both increments of *b will be collapsed to
just one):

void fn(volatile int *a, long *b)
{
	(*b)++;
	*a = 10;
	(*b)++;
}

Consequently, we need the compiler barrier after a write to the volatile
variable, to make sure that the compiler doesn't reorder the volatile
write with something else.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
 arch/metag/include/asm/barrier.h | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/metag/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/metag/include/asm/barrier.h
index c90bfc6bf648..e355a4c10968 100644
--- a/arch/metag/include/asm/barrier.h
+++ b/arch/metag/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ static inline void wr_fence(void)
 	volatile int *flushptr = (volatile int *) LINSYSEVENT_WR_FENCE;
 	barrier();
 	*flushptr = 0;
+	barrier();
 }
 
 #else /* CONFIG_METAG_META21 */
@@ -35,6 +36,7 @@ static inline void wr_fence(void)
 	*flushptr = 0;
 	*flushptr = 0;
 	*flushptr = 0;
+	barrier();
 }
 
 #endif /* !CONFIG_METAG_META21 */
@@ -68,6 +70,7 @@ static inline void fence(void)
 	volatile int *flushptr = (volatile int *) LINSYSEVENT_WR_ATOMIC_UNLOCK;
 	barrier();
 	*flushptr = 0;
+	barrier();
 }
 #define smp_mb()        fence()
 #define smp_rmb()       fence()
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ