[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140603121510.GI30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 14:15:10 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com, len.brown@...el.com,
alan.cox@...el.com, mark.gross@...el.com, pjt@...gle.com,
bsegall@...gle.com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, rajeev.d.muralidhar@...el.com,
vishwesh.m.rudramuni@...el.com, nicole.chalhoub@...el.com,
ajaya.durg@...el.com, harinarayanan.seshadri@...el.com,
jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com, fengguang.wu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/16 v3] Define and allocate a per CPU local cpumask
for Workload Consolidation
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 02:36:05PM +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
> We need these cpumasks to aid in cosolidated load balancing
>
That's an entirely unsatisfactory changelog. Why would you need these?
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists