[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140603144319.GD31751@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 15:43:19 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: carlo@...one.org, Boris Brezillon <boris@...e-electrons.com>,
lgirdwood@...il.com, lee.jones@...aro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kevin.z.m.zh@...il.com, sunny@...winnertech.com,
shuge@...winnertech.com, zhuzhenhua@...winnertech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] regulator: axp20x: Update the bindings to use a
local parent regulator
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 03:12:04PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 07:50:51PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 07:11:07PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > axp_mic_reg: ldo5 {
> > > + vin-supply = <&axp_ipsout_reg>;
> > This is saying that every single regulator on the device is powered by a
> > (presumably) single input called "vin". This would certainly be an
> > unusual package design... As ever the name of the supply should follow
> > the name of the pin on the device.
> Not exactly. Each regulator has its own input pin, named
> <regulator_name>in in the schematics, with the exception of LDO2 and
> LDO4 that share the same pin.
OK, so the supplies should be called <regulator_name>in then not vin.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists