linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] introduce atomic_pointer to fix a race condition in cancelable mcs spinlocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140603140727.GM22231@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 3 Jun 2014 07:07:27 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
	Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
	John David Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net>,
	Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Vinod, Chegu" <chegu_vinod@...com>,
	Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>,
	Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@...com>,
	"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@...com>,
	Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] introduce atomic_pointer to fix a race condition in
 cancelable mcs spinlocks

On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 09:36:13AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 05:12:16PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > The patch adds atomic_pointer_t for all architectures - it is in the 
> > common code and it is backed by atomic_long_t (that already exists for all 
> > architectures). There is no new arch-specific code at all.
> > 
> > When we have atomic_pointer_t, we can find the instances of xchg() and 
> > cmpxchg() and convert them to atomic_pointer_t (or to other atomic*_t 
> > types).
> > 
> > When we convert them all, we can drop xchg() and cmpxchg() at all (at 
> > least from architecture-neutral code).
> > 
> > The problem with xchg() and cmpxchg() is that they are very easy to 
> > misuse. Peter Zijlstra didn't know that they are not atomic w.r.t. normal 
> > stores, a lot of other people don't know it too - and if we allow these 
> > functions to be used, this race condition will reappear in the future 
> > again and again.
> > 
> > That's why I'm proposing atomic_pointer_t - it guarantees that this race 
> > condition can't be made.
> 
> But its horrible, and doesn't have any benefit afaict.
> 
> So if we really want to keep supporting these platforms; I would propose
> something like:
> 
> #ifdef __CHECKER__
> #define __atomic	__attribute__((address_space(5)))
> #else
> #define __atomic
> #endif
> 
> #define store(p, v)	(*(p) = (typeof(*(p)) __force __atomic)(v))
> #define load(p)		((typeof(*p) __force)ACCESS_ONCE(*(p)))
> 
> Along with changes to xchg() and cmpxchg() that require them to take
> pointers to __atomic.
> 
> That way we keep the flexibility of xchg() and cmpxchg() for being
> (mostly) type and size invariant, and get sparse to find wrong usage.
> 
> Then parisc, sparc32, tile32, metag-lock1 and arc-!llsc can go implement
> store() however they like.

Should be fun interacting with atomic operations on __rcu variables
(address space 4).  Of course, that is already fun...

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/