linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulators: Add definition of regulator_set_voltage_time() for !CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140603153258.GF31751@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 3 Jun 2014 16:32:58 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arvind Chauhan <arvind.chauhan@....com>,
	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulators: Add definition of
 regulator_set_voltage_time() for !CONFIG_REGULATOR

On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 08:52:04PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 3 June 2014 20:23, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> >> - We are checking 'regulator pointer' before calling and don't need to
> >> handle anything there..

> > I'm not sure what you mean by this.

> I meant that sometimes regulator_set_voltage() is only called when pointer
> to regulator is valid.

Could you please be more explicit about what you mean by "valid"?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)