[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-b4d3c8bd86c4eda08456691121f83b4e1db46866@git.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 11:32:38 -0700
From: tip-bot for Namhyung Kim <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
jolsa@...nel.org, rodrigo@...g.com.ar, namhyung@...nel.org,
fweisbec@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, asharma@...com
Subject: [tip:perf/core] perf report: Cache cumulative callchains
Commit-ID: b4d3c8bd86c4eda08456691121f83b4e1db46866
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/b4d3c8bd86c4eda08456691121f83b4e1db46866
Author: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:05:29 +0900
Committer: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 14:34:58 +0200
perf report: Cache cumulative callchains
It is possble that a callchain has cycles or recursive calls. In that
case it'll end up having entries more than 100% overhead in the
output. In order to prevent such entries, cache each callchain node
and skip if same entry already cumulated.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Tested-by: Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
Tested-by: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@...g.com.ar>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1401335910-16832-8-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
---
tools/perf/util/hist.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/hist.c b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
index 37c28fc..bf03db5 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/hist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
@@ -700,7 +700,22 @@ static int
iter_prepare_cumulative_entry(struct hist_entry_iter *iter __maybe_unused,
struct addr_location *al __maybe_unused)
{
+ struct hist_entry **he_cache;
+
callchain_cursor_commit(&callchain_cursor);
+
+ /*
+ * This is for detecting cycles or recursions so that they're
+ * cumulated only one time to prevent entries more than 100%
+ * overhead.
+ */
+ he_cache = malloc(sizeof(*he_cache) * (PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH + 1));
+ if (he_cache == NULL)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ iter->priv = he_cache;
+ iter->curr = 0;
+
return 0;
}
@@ -710,6 +725,7 @@ iter_add_single_cumulative_entry(struct hist_entry_iter *iter,
{
struct perf_evsel *evsel = iter->evsel;
struct perf_sample *sample = iter->sample;
+ struct hist_entry **he_cache = iter->priv;
struct hist_entry *he;
int err = 0;
@@ -720,6 +736,7 @@ iter_add_single_cumulative_entry(struct hist_entry_iter *iter,
return -ENOMEM;
iter->he = he;
+ he_cache[iter->curr++] = he;
/*
* The iter->he will be over-written after ->add_next_entry()
@@ -754,7 +771,29 @@ iter_add_next_cumulative_entry(struct hist_entry_iter *iter,
{
struct perf_evsel *evsel = iter->evsel;
struct perf_sample *sample = iter->sample;
+ struct hist_entry **he_cache = iter->priv;
struct hist_entry *he;
+ struct hist_entry he_tmp = {
+ .cpu = al->cpu,
+ .thread = al->thread,
+ .comm = thread__comm(al->thread),
+ .ip = al->addr,
+ .ms = {
+ .map = al->map,
+ .sym = al->sym,
+ },
+ .parent = iter->parent,
+ };
+ int i;
+
+ /*
+ * Check if there's duplicate entries in the callchain.
+ * It's possible that it has cycles or recursive calls.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < iter->curr; i++) {
+ if (hist_entry__cmp(he_cache[i], &he_tmp) == 0)
+ return 0;
+ }
he = __hists__add_entry(&evsel->hists, al, iter->parent, NULL, NULL,
sample->period, sample->weight,
@@ -763,6 +802,7 @@ iter_add_next_cumulative_entry(struct hist_entry_iter *iter,
return -ENOMEM;
iter->he = he;
+ he_cache[iter->curr++] = he;
return 0;
}
@@ -771,7 +811,9 @@ static int
iter_finish_cumulative_entry(struct hist_entry_iter *iter,
struct addr_location *al __maybe_unused)
{
+ zfree(&iter->priv);
iter->he = NULL;
+
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists