lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 2 Jun 2014 21:26:05 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <>
To:	Linus Torvalds <>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <>, Li Zefan <>,
	Andy Lutomirski <>,
	"" <>,
	Linux FS Devel <>,
	Jianyu Zhan <>
Subject: Re: 3.15 regression: wrong cgroup magic

On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 06:30:20PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Tejun Heo <> wrote:
> >
> > Linus, can you please cherry-pick the commit?
> I'd much rather see it go through the proper channels than go ahead
> and cherry-pick from some branch that hasn't even been sent to me yet.
> The whole "you have to send things to me for me to take them" policy
> is not new, I don't want to start taking stuff that the
> authors/maintainers haven't actively sent my way.
> That said, I suspect that Greg didn't expect this to actually matter
> (the commit message certainly doesn't make it sound like anything that
> people would notice), so the reason it is in -next is likely that
> nobody thought it was a regression.

Yes, I did not realize it at all, otherwise I would have sent it to you

> Of course, Greg could just send it to me for my next branch (since the
> merge window for 3.16 is already open) and tell me that it's also
> stable material for 3.15. At _that_ point I'll happily cherry-pick it
> intpo master...

Ok, I'll go make up a pull request tonight for that.


greg k-h
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists