[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1406032310560.3319@nanos>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 23:12:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@...g.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] signal: sighand unprotected when accessed by /proc
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 22:09:38 +0200
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > > Now, if that lock is released and reused (I didn't trace other tasks
> > > allocating these locks), it reinitializes the lock->wait_list.
> >
> > How? From where? This should be done by sighand_ctor() only?
>
> This looks definitely like an -rt only bug and it's an obvious one at
> that :-p
>
> Looking in mm/slub.c: slab_alloc_node() we have this:
>
> if (unlikely(gfpflags & __GFP_ZERO) && object)
> memset(object, 0, s->object_size);
> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
> if (unlikely(s->ctor) && object)
> s->ctor(object);
> #endif
Looks like the usual git/quilt default artifact.
That's why I have
QUILT_PATCH_OPTS="--fuzz=0"
in my .quiltrc
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists