linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] locking tree changes for v3.16

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 3 Jun 2014 14:55:26 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] locking tree changes for v3.16

On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:50:51 -0700 Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com> wrote:

> > The main changes in this cycle were:
> > 
> >  - reduced/streamlined smp_mb__*() interface that allows more usecases 
> >    and makes the existing ones less buggy, especially in rarer 
> >    architectures
> > 
> >  - add rwsem implementation comments
> > 
> >  - bump up lockdep limits
> 
> So I guess the rwsem optimistic spinning stuff will be routed through
> akpm then (which is already in -next for a while, through -mm).

I'd prefer not - I put it in there just to get some linux-next exposure.
A change like this should be carefully poked at by people who understand
what they're poking.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/