lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 02 Jun 2014 22:21:31 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
	laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
	oleg@...hat.com, sbw@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] rcu: Add Josh Triplett as designated reviewer

On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 22:10 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 08:11:36PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
[]
> "the appropriate mailing lists" often just mean LKML,
> for many patches I've sent; almost nobody sees a patch only sent to
> LKML, unless they specifically go looking for it.)

It's a good thing then that Andre Morton is all-seeing.

> > the
> > quantity of names and addresses on the [0/n]
> > patch can easily exceed vger's 1024 byte
> > maximum header size limit.
> 
> Is that the limit on the size of any *one* header, or on the size of all
> headers combined?

All headers

> > Another possibility is to add a new "--bcc_cmd"
> > to git send-email so that vger's header limit
> > can be worked around.
> 
> That breaks the ability for the recipients to see replies.

<shrug>  If interested, the recipient knows where to look.

> > I had patches to git to do that awhile ago.
> 
> That'd be handy; did you try submitting them upstream?  What reception
> did you get?

I don't recall.
It was a bit after I added the cc-cmd stuff.
Nearly 7 years ago now.

> If you have objections to putting it directly in get_maintainer.pl,

I do.

> it'd
> be easy enough to make a secondary script (patch_add_maintainers?) to
> drive it.

Go for it.

cheers, Joe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ