[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5962011401880725@web26h.yandex.ru>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 15:18:45 +0400
From: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...dex.ru>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>,
"laijs@...fujitsu.com" <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix migration_cpu_stop() return value
Hi, Peter,
04.06.2014, 14:41, "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>:
> A while ago I did a similar patch for some debugging, but looking at it
> again today I realized we should probably fix this anyway.
>
> ---
> Subject: sched: Fix migration_cpu_stop() return value
>
> There are a number of migration_cpu_stop() users; and some actually care
> about the success of the migration. So report this.
>
> In particular migrate_task_to() as used from task_numa_migrate()
> actually tests this return value.
>
> Also change set_cpus_allowed_ptr() to propagate this return value, since
> it already returns other errors.
>
> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
(snipped everything because of bad email editor)
In set_cpus_allowed_ptr() p->on_rq branch can not fail.
We've changed affinity and released rq's lock, so task can migrate
on allowed cpu only (even if migration_cpu_stop fails).
And it's a little ambiguously how user should react on this EAGAIN.
Regards,
Kirill.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists