linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] virtio-scsi patches for 3.16 + midlayer fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <538F03F0.8050506@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 04 Jun 2014 13:33:04 +0200
From:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
CC:	hch@....de, JBottomley@...allels.com, venkateshs@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] virtio-scsi patches for 3.16 + midlayer fix

Il 04/06/2014 13:21, Bart Van Assche ha scritto:
>
> Thanks for the quick respin. However, since you are mentioning that in
> v2 all occurrences of "scmd->result |= DID_TIME_OUT << 16" have been
> addressed, this made me wonder whether you had noticed the following
> code in scsi_decide_disposition() ?
>
> 	switch (host_byte(scmd->result)) {
> 	[ ... ]
> 	case DID_ABORT:
> 		if (scmd->eh_eflags & SCSI_EH_ABORT_SCHEDULED) {
> 			scmd->result |= DID_TIME_OUT << 16;
> 			return SUCCESS;
> 		}

Nope, I miscounted how many occurrences were left.  v3 on the way.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/