[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohponiCH35ZBTicCkVV3KoJzCWrnJExeR9HqwSMv+QDp36gg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 17:11:08 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linaro Networking <linaro-networking@...aro.org>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [Query] Can we use normal timers (kernel/timer.c) while in NO_HZ_FULL mode?
Hi,
While working on the ONESHOT_STOPPED mode I came across
another confusing scenario..
Normal timers (kernel/timer.c) don't configure clockevent devices
at all but they always rely on PERIODIC tick interrupts to get them
scheduled. i.e. normal timers would be only serviced at next tick
interrupt (in both LOW & HIGH resolution modes)..
Suppose we have entered into NO_HZ_FULL mode (we made
sure that there are no normal timers queued) and a normal
timer was added after that. We will add it to the timer list but
as there is no tick-sched timer, we wouldn't be able to service
the normal timer until next time tick fires again (MAX 1 second
currently)..
And once we remove this MAX 1 second limitation, we might
not service this normal timer for long..
Does this problem statement make sense? Or we don't have
any such problem?
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists