[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140604133200.GA4329@leverpostej>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:32:01 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Yi Li <yi.li@...aro.org>
Cc: "ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
"steve.capper@...aro.org" <steve.capper@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"phoenix.liyi@...wei.com" <phoenix.liyi@...wei.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM64:DMI: Add smbios/dmi support on arm64
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 04:57:13PM +0100, Yi Li wrote:
> Add smbios/dmi support on arm64 system, it depends on
> EFI boot.
And what exactly does this provide us with?
What is exposed through SMBIOS/DMI, and why would I want to enable it?
>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Li <yi.li@...aro.org>
> ---
>
> Changes since v1:
> -Followed Ard Biesheuvel's suggestion to rebase the patch on
> Matt Fleming's arm64-efi branch.
>
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/dmi.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/dmi.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 6c71f12..13ee261 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -294,6 +294,16 @@ config EFI
> allow the kernel to be booted as an EFI application. This
> is only useful on systems that have UEFI firmware.
>
> +config DMI
> + bool "Enable support for SMBIOS (DMI) tables"
> + depends on EFI
> + default y
> + help
> + This enables SMBIOS/DMI feature for systems.
> +
> + This option is only useful on systems that have UEFI firmware.
> + However, even with this option, the resultant kernel should
> + continue to boot on existing non-UEFI platforms.
> endmenu
>
> menu "Userspace binary formats"
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/dmi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/dmi.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f2198bf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/dmi.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> +/*
> + * arch/arm64/include/asm/dmi.h
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Limited.
> + * Written by: Yi Li (yi.li@...aro.org)
> + *
> + * based on arch/ia64/include/asm/dmi.h
> + *
> + * This file is subject to the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public
> + * License. See the file "COPYING" in the main directory of this archive
> + * for more details.
> + */
> +
> +
> +#ifndef _ASM_DMI_H
> +#define _ASM_DMI_H 1
> +
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <asm/io.h>
Shouldn't that be linux/efi.h?
Why do we need asm/io.h?
> +
> +/* Use efi mappings for DMI */
> +#define dmi_early_remap(x, l) efi_lookup_mapped_addr(x)
> +#define dmi_early_unmap(x, l)
> +#define dmi_remap(x, l) efi_lookup_mapped_addr(x)
> +#define dmi_unmap(x)
> +#define dmi_alloc(l) kzalloc(l, GFP_ATOMIC)
> +
> +#endif
None of these seem to use anything from io.h directly.
Cheers,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists