[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <538F3DC4.4030104@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 09:39:48 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch]blk-mq: blk_mq_tag_to_rq should handle flush request
On 06/04/2014 09:31 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 09:02:19AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> scsi_mq_find_tag only gets the scsi host, which may have multiple
>>> queues. When called from scsi_find_tag we actually have a scsi device,
>>> so that's not an issue, but when called from scsi_host_find_tag the
>>> driver only provides the host.
>>
>> Only solution I see right now is to have the flush_rq in the shared
>> tags, but that would potentially be a regression for multiple
>> devices and heavy flush uses cases. I'll see if I can come up with
>> something better, or maybe Shaohua has an idea.
>
> What about something like the following (untest, uncompiled, maybe
> pseudo-code):
>
> struct request *blk_mq_tag_to_rq(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, unsigned int tag)
> {
> struct request *rq = tags->rqs[tag];
>
> if ((rq->cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH_SEQ) && rq->q->flush_rq->tag == tag)
> return rq->q->flush_rq;
> return rq;
Ah yes, that'll work, the queue is always assigned. I'll make that change.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists