[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140604161123.GG5004@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 12:11:23 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Anatol Pomozov <anatol.pomozov@...il.com>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>, linux-aio@...ck.org,
Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>,
Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu-refcount: fix usage of this_cpu_ops (was Re:
hanging aio process)
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 03:58:24PM +0200, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> From 82295633cad58c7d6b9af4e470e3168ed43a6779 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
> Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 12:53:19 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] percpu-refcount: fix usage of this_cpu_ops
>
> The percpu-refcount infrastructure uses the underscore variants of
> this_cpu_ops in order to modify percpu reference counters.
> (e.g. __this_cpu_inc()).
>
> However the underscore variants do not atomically update the percpu
> variable, instead they may be implemented using read-modify-write
> semantics (more than one instruction). Therefore it is only safe to
> use the underscore variant if the context is always the same (process,
> softirq, or hardirq). Otherwise it is possible to lose updates.
>
> This problem is something that Sebastian has seen within the aio
> subsystem which uses percpu refcounters both in process and softirq
> context leading to reference counts that never dropped to zeroes; even
> though the number of "get" and "put" calls matched.
>
> Fix this by using the non-underscore this_cpu_ops variant which
> provides correct per cpu atomic semantics and fixes the corrupted
> reference counts.
>
> Cc: Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v3.11+
> Reported-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Bah... should have caught it way back. Sorry about that. Appying to
percpu/for-3.15-fixes with stable cc'd.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists