[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140604163945.GA26429@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 18:39:45 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] uprobes/x86: Rename arch_uprobe->def into ->dflt,
minor comment updates
On 06/04, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> (2014/06/04 4:13), Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 06/03, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >>
> >> So exactly what do those fields do? If it's scratch register handling,
> >> would it be logical to name it arch_uprobe->scratch, or so?
> >
> > Not only, ->fixups encodes other flags. and ->ilen is used by UPROBE_FIX_CALL.
> >
> > arch_uprobe->def contains the arguments for default_xol_ops methods, currently
> > this handles everything except relative jmp/call insns.
> >
> > So perhaps ->dflt is not that ugly in this case? I simply do not see anything
> > better. But again, I agree with any name in advance.
>
> Hmm, how about ->defparam ? :)
Fine with me ;)
Ingo, will you agree with s/def/defparam/ ?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists