[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1406042118420.1977@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 21:19:13 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: "Marciniszyn, Mike" <mike.marciniszyn@...el.com>
cc: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
infinipath <infinipath@...el.com>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>,
"Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 9/10] IB/qib: use safer test on the result of
find_first_zero_bit
On Wed, 4 Jun 2014, Marciniszyn, Mike wrote:
> > Subject: [PATCH 9/10] IB/qib: use safer test on the result of find_first_zero_bit
> >
> > From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
>
> Thanks for the patch!
>
> Roland, I'm marking this as stable since a memory corruption can occur in the _set_bit().
No, it's not necessary. It turns out that the result cannot be greater
than the requested maximum value.
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists