[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1406042157220.18296@nanos>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 22:02:17 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
On Wed, 4 Jun 2014, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> So, we'll dial back and stop taking these patches through our tree
> without an explicit ack or shared branch from you (or Daniel on
> clocksource). Not a problem at all.
I prefer the shared branch (for clocksource and irqchip) either from
me or from Daniel(clocksource) / Jason (irqchip).
That way you can proceed and we can do our unrelated changes without
creating merge dependencies.
> On the other hand, it would have been a lot easier
> to handle had the code on your end landed a bit sooner than in the
> middle of the merge window.
I know. I was just burried in futex wreckage for almost a week...
> Not much I can say besides what's above and that I owe you a few beers
> at the next conference.
Don't worry. I let off steam and all is good if we can avoid this in
the future. Though I'm certainly up for a few beers :)
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists