[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJUuVQ4VioKuVuCTXr3BcfRpYs+9+5bx9m2WLO7Swsnni0tUAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 16:56:50 -0400
From: Andev <debiandev@...il.com>
To: Pranith Kumar <pranith@...ech.edu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] remove redundant compare, cmpxchg already does it
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Pranith Kumar <pranith@...ech.edu> wrote:
> remove a redundant comparision
>
> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
> ---
> kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
> index 1f99664b..6f8bd3c 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
> @@ -249,8 +249,7 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(long count, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> {
> if (!(count & RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK)) {
> /* try acquiring the write lock */
> - if (sem->count == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS &&
> - cmpxchg(&sem->count, RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS,
> + if (cmpxchg(&sem->count, RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS,
> RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS) == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS) {
This was mainly done to avoid the cost of a cmpxchg in case where they
are not equal. Not sure if it really makes a difference though.
--
Andev
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists