[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140604162832.aba2abbbceb6308491a189d2@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 16:28:32 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
cxie@...hat.com, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Print cpu number along with time
On Wed, 4 Jun 2014 19:15:06 -0400 J__rn Engel <joern@...fs.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 April 2014 17:22:19 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 19:40:39 -0400 J__rn Engel <joern@...fs.org> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 24 April 2014 15:40:24 -0400, J__rn Engel wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 23 April 2014 20:52:47 -0400, J__rn Engel wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I use the patch below for some time now. While it doesn't avoid the
> > > > > log pollution in the first place, it lessens the impact somewhat.
> > > >
> > > > Added a config option and ported it to current -linus. Andrew, would
> > > > you take this patch?
> > >
> > > Andrew? Did you dislike this patch for some reason or just miss it in
> > > the thread?
> >
> > Neither ;) I try to respond in some way to all patches unless I think it's clear
> > to the originator why I took no action. And I think I'm pretty good at
> > not losing stuff.
> >
> > otoh, it has only been four days, three of which I spent offline...
>
> Ping. It is closer to 40 days now. Can I fault this patch back into
> your memory?
>
Sorry, it seems I'm better at losing stuff than I thought I was.
I've restored the patch to the input queue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists