[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10878.1402006560@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 23:16:00 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
"J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05g@...il.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Robo Bot <apw@...onical.com>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Jordi Pujol <jordipujolp@...il.com>, ezk@....cs.sunysb.edu,
"mszeredi@...e.cz" <mszeredi@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: Unionmount and overlayfs testsuite
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> Shell script is the one I'm most familiar with, and that maybe true
> for other kernel developers too.
>
> Also, it's what xfstests are using and it would make sense to move
> towards that. Although I'm not sure how well it supports
> multiple-device filesystems.
It was already shell script, but I can do all the layer checking and
automatically fixing up the error prediction for when pathnames have slashes
appended much more easily in something like python where I can build and
maintain a map of the state of the filesystem.
See:
http://git.infradead.org/users/dhowells/unionmount-testsuite.git/shortlog/refs/heads/switch-to-python
I've also added tests to exercise mkdir and rmdir and have enabled the unlink
tests. So far so good with overlayfs.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists