lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140604232353.428134008@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Wed,  4 Jun 2014 16:23:17 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, John David Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net>,
	Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Subject: [PATCH 3.14 168/228] parisc: Improve LWS-CAS performance

3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net>

commit c776cd89fc705fc8b5c2e5ad906bf5d791620fed upstream.

The attached change significantly improves the performance of the LWS-CAS code
in syscall.S.
This allows a number of packages to build (e.g., zeromq3, gtest and libxs)
that previously failed because slow LWS-CAS performance under contention. In
particular, interrupts taken while the lock was taken degraded performance
significantly.

The change does the following:

1) Disables interrupts around the CAS operation, and
2) Changes the loads and stores to use the ordered completer, "o", on
PA 2.0. "o" and "ma" with a zero offset are equivalent. The latter is
accepted on both PA 1.X and 2.0.

The use of ordered loads and stores probably makes no difference on all
existing hardware, but it seemed pedantically correct. In particular, the CAS
operation must complete before LDCW lock is released. As written before, a
processor could reorder the operations.

I don't believe the period interrupts are disabled is long enough to
significantly increase interrupt latency. For example, the TLB insert code is
longer. Worst case is a memory fault in the CAS operation.

Signed-off-by: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net>
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/parisc/kernel/syscall.S |   12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/parisc/kernel/syscall.S
+++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/syscall.S
@@ -589,10 +589,13 @@ cas_nocontend:
 # endif
 /* ENABLE_LWS_DEBUG */
 
+	rsm	PSW_SM_I, %r0				/* Disable interrupts */
+	/* COW breaks can cause contention on UP systems */
 	LDCW	0(%sr2,%r20), %r28			/* Try to acquire the lock */
 	cmpb,<>,n	%r0, %r28, cas_action		/* Did we get it? */
 cas_wouldblock:
 	ldo	2(%r0), %r28				/* 2nd case */
+	ssm	PSW_SM_I, %r0
 	b	lws_exit				/* Contended... */
 	ldo	-EAGAIN(%r0), %r21			/* Spin in userspace */
 
@@ -619,15 +622,17 @@ cas_action:
 	stw	%r1, 4(%sr2,%r20)
 #endif
 	/* The load and store could fail */
-1:	ldw	0(%sr3,%r26), %r28
+1:	ldw,ma	0(%sr3,%r26), %r28
 	sub,<>	%r28, %r25, %r0
-2:	stw	%r24, 0(%sr3,%r26)
+2:	stw,ma	%r24, 0(%sr3,%r26)
 	/* Free lock */
-	stw	%r20, 0(%sr2,%r20)
+	stw,ma	%r20, 0(%sr2,%r20)
 #if ENABLE_LWS_DEBUG
 	/* Clear thread register indicator */
 	stw	%r0, 4(%sr2,%r20)
 #endif
+	/* Enable interrupts */
+	ssm	PSW_SM_I, %r0
 	/* Return to userspace, set no error */
 	b	lws_exit
 	copy	%r0, %r21
@@ -639,6 +644,7 @@ cas_action:
 #if ENABLE_LWS_DEBUG
 	stw	%r0, 4(%sr2,%r20)
 #endif
+	ssm	PSW_SM_I, %r0
 	b	lws_exit
 	ldo	-EFAULT(%r0),%r21	/* set errno */
 	nop


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ