[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1AE640813FDE7649BE1B193DEA596E880262042C@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 01:14:54 +0000
From: "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"wsa@...-dreams.de" <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...ica.org" <devel@...ica.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/7] ACPICA: Only include ACPI asm files if ACPI is
enabled
Hi, Lee
> From: Lee Jones [mailto:lee.jones@...aro.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 8:52 PM
> To: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> On Wed, 04 Jun 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, June 04, 2014 01:09:50 PM Lee Jones wrote:
> > > Any drivers which support ACPI and Device Tree probing need to include
> > > both respective header files. Without this patch, if a driver is being
> > > used on a platform which does not support ACPI and subsequently does not
> > > have the config option enabled, but includes linux/acpi.h the build
> > > breaks with:
> > >
> > > In file included from ../include/acpi/platform/acenv.h:150:0,
> > > from ../include/acpi/acpi.h:56,
> > > from ../include/linux/match.h:2,
> > > from ../drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:43:
> > > ../include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h:73:23:
> > > fatal error: asm/acenv.h: No such file or directory
> > > #include <asm/acenv.h>
> > > ^
Note that:
In our tree:
<asm/acenv.h> is only included by <acpi/acpi.h>.
And <acpi/acpi.h> is only included by
1. <linux/acpi.h> when CONFIG_ACPI enabled
2. <linux/sfi_acpi.h> - this is x86 specific, we'll clean it up by implementing stubs for all ACPI external interfaces.
So there is no case we need to exclude <asm/acenv.h> when CONFIG_ACPI is not enabled.
I cannot find linux/match.h here.
If <linux/match.h> want to include ACPI features, it shouldn't include <acpi/acpi.h>, but should include <linux/acpi.h>.
Please refer to:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=8b48463f
And stop including <acpi/acpi.h> directly in any cases.
Thanks and best regards
-Lv
> >
> > Which kernel does this happen with?
>
> a0a962d (tag: refs/tags/next-20140602, refs/remotes/next/master)
> Add linux-next specific files for 20140602
>
> > > Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
> > > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > > Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
> > > Cc: devel@...ica.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > > ---
> > > include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h | 5 +++--
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h b/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
> > > index cd1f052..fdf7663 100644
> > > --- a/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
> > > +++ b/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
> > > @@ -70,9 +70,10 @@
> > > #ifdef EXPORT_ACPI_INTERFACES
> > > #include <linux/export.h>
> > > #endif
> > > -#include <asm/acenv.h>
> > >
> > > -#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> > > +#include <asm/acenv.h>
> > > +#else
> > >
> > > /* External globals for __KERNEL__, stubs is needed */
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> --
> Lee Jones
> Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
> Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists