linux-kernel - Re: [patch]blk-mq: blk_mq_tag_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140605022738.GA22826@kernel.org>
Date:	Thu, 5 Jun 2014 10:27:38 +0800
From:	Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch]blk-mq: blk_mq_tag_to_rq should handle flush request

On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 08:05:33PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2014-06-04 19:27, Shaohua Li wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 10:25:22AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>On 06/04/2014 09:47 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>>On 06/04/2014 09:39 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>>>On 06/04/2014 09:31 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >>>>>On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 09:02:19AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>>>>>>scsi_mq_find_tag only gets the scsi host, which may have multiple
> >>>>>>>queues.  When called from scsi_find_tag we actually have a scsi device,
> >>>>>>>so that's not an issue, but when called from scsi_host_find_tag the
> >>>>>>>driver only provides the host.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Only solution I see right now is to have the flush_rq in the shared
> >>>>>>tags, but that would potentially be a regression for multiple
> >>>>>>devices and heavy flush uses cases. I'll see if I can come up with
> >>>>>>something better, or maybe Shaohua has an idea.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>What about something like the following (untest, uncompiled, maybe
> >>>>>pseudo-code):
> >>>>>
> >>>>>struct request *blk_mq_tag_to_rq(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, unsigned int tag)
> >>>>>{
> >>>>>	struct request *rq = tags->rqs[tag];
> >>>>>
> >>>>>	if ((rq->cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH_SEQ) && rq->q->flush_rq->tag == tag)
> >>>>>		return rq->q->flush_rq;
> >>>>>	return rq;
> >>>>
> >>>>Ah yes, that'll work, the queue is always assigned. I'll make that change.
> >>>
> >>>Something like this in complete form. Compile tested only, I'll test it
> >>>on dev box. Probably doesn't matter too much, but I prefer to
> >>>potentially have the faster path (non-flush) just fall inline.
> >>
> >>Works for me, committed.
> >
> >Sounds there is a small race here. FUA request has REQ_FLUSH_SEQ set too.
> >Assume its tag is 0. we initialize flush_rq.
> >blk_mq_rq_init->blk_rq_init->memset could set flush_rq tag to 0 in a short
> >time. In that short time, blk_mq_tag_to_rq will return wrong request for the
> >FUA request.
> >
> >we can do (rq->cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH_SEQ) && !(rq->cmd_flags & REQ_FUA) in
> >is_flush_request to avoid this issue.
> 
> We don't memset the entire request anymore from the rq alloc path.

blk_kick_flush() still calls blk_rq_init()?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/