linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] ACPICA: Only include ACPI asm files if ACPI is enabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <538FEDE9.4010603@linaro.org>
Date:	Thu, 05 Jun 2014 12:11:21 +0800
From:	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
To:	"Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"wsa@...-dreams.de" <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel@...ica.org" <devel@...ica.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] ACPICA: Only include ACPI asm files if ACPI is enabled

On 2014-6-5 9:14, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Hi, Lee
> 
>> From: Lee Jones [mailto:lee.jones@...aro.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 8:52 PM
>> To: Rafael J. Wysocki
>>
>> On Wed, 04 Jun 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday, June 04, 2014 01:09:50 PM Lee Jones wrote:
>>>> Any drivers which support ACPI and Device Tree probing need to include
>>>> both respective header files.  Without this patch, if a driver is being
>>>> used on a platform which does not support ACPI and subsequently does not
>>>> have the config option enabled, but includes linux/acpi.h the build
>>>> breaks with:
>>>>
>>>>   In file included from ../include/acpi/platform/acenv.h:150:0,
>>>>                    from ../include/acpi/acpi.h:56,
>>>>                    from ../include/linux/match.h:2,
>>>>                    from ../drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:43:
>>>>   ../include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h:73:23:
>>>>    fatal error: asm/acenv.h: No such file or directory
>>>>    #include <asm/acenv.h>
>>>>                        ^
> 
> Note that:
> In our tree:
> <asm/acenv.h> is only included by <acpi/acpi.h>.
> And <acpi/acpi.h> is only included by
> 1. <linux/acpi.h> when CONFIG_ACPI enabled
> 2. <linux/sfi_acpi.h> - this is x86 specific, we'll clean it up by implementing stubs for all ACPI external interfaces.
> So there is no case we need to exclude <asm/acenv.h> when CONFIG_ACPI is not enabled.
> 
> I cannot find linux/match.h here.
> If <linux/match.h> want to include ACPI features, it shouldn't include <acpi/acpi.h>, but should include <linux/acpi.h>.
> Please refer to:
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=8b48463f
> And stop including <acpi/acpi.h> directly in any cases.

Ah, I agree, please ignore my previous email,
sorry for the noise.

Since it is very important to include <linux/acpi.h> but not <acpi/acpi.h>,
can we document it somewhere as the guidance? Then people will not
make such mistake :)

Thanks
Hanjun

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/