[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140605083804.GF4926@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 10:38:04 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E.McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@...com>,
"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] rwsem: Support optimistic spinning
When trying to apply this patch again I noticed the following detail:
> From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
>
> [...]
>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
That's not a valid signoff sequence - the person sending the patch
should be the last SOB.
I've changed it to:
Based-on-work-from: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
which I suspect describes the intention of the SOB line fairly?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists