linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] locking tree changes for v3.16

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140605092130.GC6758@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Thu, 5 Jun 2014 11:21:30 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] locking tree changes for v3.16

On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 10:17:42AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Ingo is 'missing' most of the time, so while I sit here with a 
> > massive queue of patches its nearly impossible for me to get 
> > anything merged :-(
> 
> Right now I'm somewhat 'missing' because I fell ill right when the 
> merge window began :-/ But I merged all your pending bits shortly 
> before the merge window started. During the merge window itself I
> try not to merge fresh patches.

Yeah, no problem that, it just shows we need to better arrange things
for when you're not available.

My/our quilt workflow works really good for me when you're there, but
its obviously somewhat broken without you. We just need to work out a
(better) fallback case.

The timing was just somewhat unfortunate.

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped