[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140605095836.GB23641@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 11:58:36 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Differentiate exec() and non-exec() comm events
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Nah, I'll frob it. Thanks!
>
> FYI, this patch breaks pretty much every non-x86 architecture:
>
> /home/mingo/tip/fs/exec.c: In function 'setup_new_exec':
> /home/mingo/tip/fs/exec.c:1113: error: implicit declaration of function 'perf_event_exec'
> make[2]: *** [fs/exec.o] Error 1
> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make[1]: *** [fs] Error 2
> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Sorry, it was another patch that broke things:
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Date: Wed May 21 17:32:19 2014 +0200
perf: Fix perf_event_comm() vs. exec() assumption
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists