linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.14 138/228] fix races between __d_instantiate() and checks of dentry flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140604232352.449628989@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Wed,  4 Jun 2014 16:22:47 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 3.14 138/228] fix races between __d_instantiate() and checks of dentry flags

3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>

commit 22213318af7ae265bc6cd8aef2febbc2d69a2440 upstream.

in non-lazy walk we need to be careful about dentry switching from
negative to positive - both ->d_flags and ->d_inode are updated,
and in some places we might see only one store.  The cases where
dentry has been obtained by dcache lookup with ->i_mutex held on
parent are safe - ->d_lock and ->i_mutex provide all the barriers
we need.  However, there are several places where we run into
trouble:
	* do_last() fetches ->d_inode, then checks ->d_flags and
assumes that inode won't be NULL unless d_is_negative() is true.
Race with e.g. creat() - we might have fetched the old value of
->d_inode (still NULL) and new value of ->d_flags (already not
DCACHE_MISS_TYPE).  Lin Ming has observed and reported the resulting
oops.
	* a bunch of places checks ->d_inode for being non-NULL,
then checks ->d_flags for "is it a symlink".  Race with symlink(2)
in case if our CPU sees ->d_inode update first - we see non-NULL
there, but ->d_flags still contains DCACHE_MISS_TYPE instead of
DCACHE_SYMLINK_TYPE.  Result: false negative on "should we follow
link here?", with subsequent unpleasantness.

Reported-and-tested-by: Lin Ming <minggr@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/dcache.c |    3 +--
 fs/namei.c  |    6 +++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -1647,8 +1647,7 @@ static void __d_instantiate(struct dentr
 	unsigned add_flags = d_flags_for_inode(inode);
 
 	spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
-	dentry->d_flags &= ~DCACHE_ENTRY_TYPE;
-	dentry->d_flags |= add_flags;
+	__d_set_type(dentry, add_flags);
 	if (inode)
 		hlist_add_head(&dentry->d_alias, &inode->i_dentry);
 	dentry->d_inode = inode;
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -1537,7 +1537,7 @@ static inline int walk_component(struct
 		inode = path->dentry->d_inode;
 	}
 	err = -ENOENT;
-	if (!inode)
+	if (!inode || d_is_negative(path->dentry))
 		goto out_path_put;
 
 	if (should_follow_link(path->dentry, follow)) {
@@ -2240,7 +2240,7 @@ mountpoint_last(struct nameidata *nd, st
 	mutex_unlock(&dir->d_inode->i_mutex);
 
 done:
-	if (!dentry->d_inode) {
+	if (!dentry->d_inode || d_is_negative(dentry)) {
 		error = -ENOENT;
 		dput(dentry);
 		goto out;
@@ -2982,7 +2982,7 @@ retry_lookup:
 finish_lookup:
 	/* we _can_ be in RCU mode here */
 	error = -ENOENT;
-	if (d_is_negative(path->dentry)) {
+	if (!inode || d_is_negative(path->dentry)) {
 		path_to_nameidata(path, nd);
 		goto out;
 	}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/