[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJe_ZhcwCF63Uryiguog3FH_aV5zptrhK_qoTKA0=bTvkOEP3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 17:22:27 +0530
From: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
To: Matt Porter <mporter@...aro.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Anna, Suman" <s-anna@...com>,
Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@...com>,
LeyFoon Tan <lftan.linux@...il.com>,
Craig McGeachie <slapdau@...oo.com.au>,
Courtney Cavin <courtney.cavin@...ymobile.com>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"ks.giri@...sung.com" <ks.giri@...sung.com>,
Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@...o.se>,
Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 2/3] mailbox: Introduce framework for mailbox
On 5 June 2014 16:21, Matt Porter <mporter@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 12:01:24AM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
>> Introduce common framework for client/protocol drivers and
>> controller drivers of Inter-Processor-Communication (IPC).
>>
>> Client driver developers should have a look at
>> include/linux/mailbox_client.h to understand the part of
>> the API exposed to client drivers.
>> Similarly controller driver developers should have a look
>> at include/linux/mailbox_controller.h
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mailbox.txt | 33 ++
>> drivers/mailbox/Makefile | 4 +
>> drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c | 487 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/mailbox_client.h | 45 ++
>> include/linux/mailbox_controller.h | 121 +++++
>
> Could you please include all the DT maintainers here? It's a generic
> binding that needs wider review and an ack. The binding should be
> separated as noted below.
>
> From Documentations/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt:
>
> I. For patch submitters
>
> 0) Normal patch submission rules from Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> applies.
>
> 1) The Documentation/ portion of the patch should be a separate patch.
>
> 2) Submit the entire series to the devicetree mailinglist at
>
> devicetree@...r.kernel.org
>
Thanks. I missed CC'ing DT ML. I remember patches with DT bindings
and parser code getting upstream... and actually see better sense in
that. But I guess I have to separate out the bindings.
Thanks
Jassi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists