[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140605124725.GB1975@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 14:47:25 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] locking tree changes for v3.16
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 02:35:12PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 01:11:10PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > Unfortunately even with the latest bits from you the breakage I
> > > > reported weeks ago is not resolved:
> > >
> > > crap, its the qrwlock bits, I fixed it for the config you gave me.
> > > Some paravirt crap header hell thing. Happen to have another
> > > .config?
> >
> > A simple 'make defconfig' triggers the build failure for me:
> >
> > kernel/locking/qrwlock.c:24:25: fatal error: asm/qrwlock.h: No such file or directory
> >
> > If I apply the minimal feature-enabling patch below on top of the base
> > qrwlock patch.
> >
>
> Well, that second patch which you neutered below would've provided that
> asm/qrwlock.h.
Oops, indeed...
> Lemme see if I can find it with randconfig with both patches
> applied.
I've attached that config to my first report (I've attached it again)
- it was a !CONFIG_SMP config. If you resolved then please resend the
latest and I'll check whether there's anything broken.
Thanks,
Ingo
View attachment "config" of type "text/plain" (101453 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists