linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/13] kexec: Move segment verification code in a separate function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140605140506.GC17389@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 5 Jun 2014 10:05:06 -0400
From:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, hpa@...or.com, mjg59@...f.ucam.org,
	greg@...ah.com, jkosina@...e.cz, dyoung@...hat.com,
	chaowang@...hat.com, bhe@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] kexec: Move segment verification code in a
 separate function

On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 10:30:41PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 02:47:43PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > Hmm..., Interesting. I never noticed it. So google search seems to say
> > that unuseable is also not wrong.
> 
> Nope, it seems more like "unuseable" is simply a very common misspelling
> which has managed to spread out uncontrollably, even in the kernel :).
> Both Oxford and Merriam-Webster know "unusable" as the only correct
> spelling.

Ok, given that you feel so strongly about it, I will change it next
version of patches. :-).

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/