[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-0f397f2c90ce68821ee864c2c53baafe78de765d@git.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 07:33:53 -0700
From: tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org,
tkhai@...dex.ru, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:sched/urgent] sched/dl: Fix race in dl_task_timer()
Commit-ID: 0f397f2c90ce68821ee864c2c53baafe78de765d
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/0f397f2c90ce68821ee864c2c53baafe78de765d
Author: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...dex.ru>
AuthorDate: Tue, 20 May 2014 13:33:42 +0400
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 11:51:12 +0200
sched/dl: Fix race in dl_task_timer()
Throttled task is still on rq, and it may be moved to other cpu
if user is playing with sched_setaffinity(). Therefore, unlocked
task_rq() access makes the race.
Juri Lelli reports he got this race when dl_bandwidth_enabled()
was not set.
Other thing, pointed by Peter Zijlstra:
"Now I suppose the problem can still actually happen when
you change the root domain and trigger a effective affinity
change that way".
To fix that we do the same as made in __task_rq_lock(). We do not
use __task_rq_lock() itself, because it has a useful lockdep check,
which is not correct in case of dl_task_timer(). We do not need
pi_lock locked here. This case is an exception (PeterZ):
"The only reason we don't strictly need ->pi_lock now is because
we're guaranteed to have p->state == TASK_RUNNING here and are
thus free of ttwu races".
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...dex.ru>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v3.14+
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/3056991400578422@web14g.yandex.ru
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 800e99b..14bc348 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -513,9 +513,17 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart dl_task_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
struct sched_dl_entity,
dl_timer);
struct task_struct *p = dl_task_of(dl_se);
- struct rq *rq = task_rq(p);
+ struct rq *rq;
+again:
+ rq = task_rq(p);
raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
+ if (rq != task_rq(p)) {
+ /* Task was moved, retrying. */
+ raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
+ goto again;
+ }
+
/*
* We need to take care of a possible races here. In fact, the
* task might have changed its scheduling policy to something
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists