[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140605180524.GC4121@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 11:05:24 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
sudeep.holla@....com, linux@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 005/103] irqchip: Gic: Support forced affinity
setting
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 05:05:00PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 12:24:28AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> >
> > commit ffde1de64012c406dfdda8690918248b472f24e4 upstream.
> >
> > To support the affinity setting of per cpu timers in the early startup
> > of a not yet online cpu, implement the force logic, which disables the
> > cpu online check.
> >
> > Tagged for stable to allow a simple fix of the affected SoC clock
> > event drivers.
>
> This patch alone has the possiblity of breaking CPU hotplug on arm and
> arm64 (specifically it breaks hot unplugging CPU0 where interrupts may
> be left targetting the offline CPU).
>
> For arm64 [1] that's fixed by commit 601c942176d8 (arm64: use
> cpu_online_mask when using forced irq_set_affinity).
Thanks, I'll apply that to the 3.14-stable tree, but, it doesn't seem
relevant at all for 3.10-stable as arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c doesn't do
anything with cpumask or set_affinity. If it's relevant for 3.10,
please provide a backported version.
> Unfortunately there is not an equivalent fix for arm - Russell objected
> to the approach [2,3,4], and that's not yet settled.
Ok, be sure to cc: stable on the patch when it goes into the tree and
I'll pick it up then.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists