[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 09:29:24 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Pranith Kumar <pranith@...ech.edu>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: regarding use of various cmpxchg* API
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 06:44:37PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> Hi Peter, Ingo,
>
> I see that in the drivers there are the following types of cmpxchg API:
>
> __cmpxchg64()
That shouldn't really be used, and its only used in intel-iommu.c.
> atomic_cmpxchg()
> atomic64_cmpxchg()
> atomic_long_cmpxchg()
They're part of the atomic*_t family and should be used on their
respective types, no point in changing that.
> local_cmpxchg()(in kernel/events/ring_buffer.c)
This is part of the local_t API, also no real point to change that.
> this_cpu_cmpxchg()
This is part of the this_cpu*() family, and there's no way you can
generate the same code using the below to.
> cmpxchg()
> cmpxchg_local()
Which leaves these, which are used in all other cases.
> Since cmpxchg() internally handles the width, do you think it makes
> sense to replace the above uses of cmpxchg with the document API
> (cmpxchg, atomic_cmpxchg, cmpxchg_local)?
>
> I am willing to do this and wanted to know if it something you think
> is worth pursuing.
Don't think that's useful. If you really want to go do something, try
the annotation I suggested to get the parisc/sparc32 things correct
again. Add the __atomic sparse address space and the store()/load()
accessors.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists