[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 10:09:03 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
amit.kucheria@...aro.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] sched: idle: Encapsulate the code to compile it
out
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 05:32:25PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> That would be perfectly fine by me, but I'm not sure what Ingo and Peter think
> about that.
>
> I can set up a branch with sched/idle/cpuidle changes.
Ingo typically likes things like that. I'm still a git Luddite, I'll
learn someday :-)
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists