linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc, kexec: Fix "Processor X is stuck" issue during kexec from ST mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 06 Jun 2014 18:07:18 +0530
From:	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
CC:	ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, matt@...abs.org, mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	suzuki@...ibm.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, paulus@...ba.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc, kexec: Fix "Processor X is stuck" issue during
 kexec from ST mode

On 06/06/2014 05:59 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
 
> +bool kexec_cpu_wake(void)
> +{
> +	kexec_smp_down(NULL);
> +
> +	/* NOTREACHED */
> +	return true;
> +}
> +

This function doesn't have to return anything, so we can define it as void.
The bool is a remnant of my previous attempt at making this work. (But these
patches compile fine as they are, though).

Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/