linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] introduce atomic_pointer to fix a race condition in cancelable mcs spinlocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 6 Jun 2014 08:15:18 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
	Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
	John David Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net>,
	Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Vinod, Chegu" <chegu_vinod@...com>,
	Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>,
	Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@...com>,
	"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@...com>,
	Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] introduce atomic_pointer to fix a race condition in
 cancelable mcs spinlocks

On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 05:06:07PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 10:09:35AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > And I can't say I'm a particular fan of these ops either, as alternative
> > > I'm almost inclined to just exclude parisc from using opt spinning.
> > 
> > Please do.
> 
> Something like so; if the rwsem stuff lands in .15 we need more for
> that, it doesn't have a convenient CONFIG symbol like this.
> 
> Linus will you take this from email, or should I get it through
> tip/locking/urgent or so?
> 
> ---
> Subject: locking, mutex: Disable optimistic spinning for PA-RISC
> 
> PA-RISC's cmpxchg is not save against normal stores and the code used
> for optimistic spinning is known broken because of this.
> 
> Disable for now.
> 
> Reported-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>

Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

> ---
>  kernel/Kconfig.locks | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.locks b/kernel/Kconfig.locks
> index 35536d9c0964..9c239e080c2d 100644
> --- a/kernel/Kconfig.locks
> +++ b/kernel/Kconfig.locks
> @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ endif
> 
>  config MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER
>  	def_bool y
> -	depends on SMP && !DEBUG_MUTEXES
> +	depends on SMP && !DEBUG_MUTEXES && !PARISC
> 
>  config ARCH_USE_QUEUE_RWLOCK
>  	bool
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/