linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.14 000/228] 3.14.6-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140606153233.GC13635@kroah.com>
Date:	Fri, 6 Jun 2014 08:32:33 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@...il.com>
Cc:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	shuah.kh@...sung.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.14 000/228] 3.14.6-stable review

On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 11:51:42PM +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> At Fri, 6 Jun 2014 00:53:10 -0700,
> Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 04:20:08PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 04:20:29PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.14.6 release.
> > > > There are 228 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > > 
> > > > Responses should be made by Fri Jun  6 23:23:11 UTC 2014.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > 
> > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > > 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.14.6-rc1.gz
> > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > 
> > > I've updated the stable tree with the futex patches as lots of people
> > > have been asking me about them, so here is a -rc2 with them
> > > incorporated:
> > > 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.14.6-rc1.gz
> 
> "s/-rc1/-rc2/" ? I used the following one.

Yes, sorry :(

> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.14.6-rc2.xz
> 
> > > 
> > 
> > Build and qemu tests are still ok. Same applies to 3.4 and 3.10.
> 
> 3.14.6-rc2, 3.10.42-rc1, and 3.4.92-rc1 passed my test.
> 
>  - Test Cases:
>    - Build this kernel.
>    - Boot this kernel.
>    - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
> 
>  - Test Tool:
>    https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
> 
>  - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
>    http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/<version>-<test datetime>.tar.xz
> 
>  - Build Environment:
>    - OS: Debian Jessy x86_64
>    - CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4
>    - memory: 8GB
> 
>  - Test Target Environment:
>    - Debian Jessy x86_64 (KVM guest on the Build Environment)
>    - # of vCPU: 2
>    - memory: 2GB

Great, thanks for testing and letting me know.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/