[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 10:13:08 -0700
From: Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org, mpatocka@...hat.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, waiman.long@...com,
jejb@...isc-linux.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
dave.anglin@...l.net, aswin@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] locking/rwsem: Add CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 08:55 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Just like with mutexes (CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER),
> encapsulate the dependencies for rwsem optimistic spinning.
> No logical changes here as it continues to depend on both
> SMP and the XADD algorithm variant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
> ---
> include/linux/rwsem.h | 4 ++--
> kernel/Kconfig.locks | 4 ++++
> kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Do we also want to add an #ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER in
__init_rwsem() and in the optimistic spinning functions for rwsem-xadd?
Besides that:
Acked-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists