[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 11:12:38 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
To: Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org, mpatocka@...hat.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, waiman.long@...com,
jejb@...isc-linux.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
dave.anglin@...l.net, aswin@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] locking/rwsem: Add CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 10:13 -0700, Jason Low wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 08:55 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > Just like with mutexes (CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER),
> > encapsulate the dependencies for rwsem optimistic spinning.
> > No logical changes here as it continues to depend on both
> > SMP and the XADD algorithm variant.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/rwsem.h | 4 ++--
> > kernel/Kconfig.locks | 4 ++++
> > kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Do we also want to add an #ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER in
> __init_rwsem() and in the optimistic spinning functions for rwsem-xadd?
>
Not really, as we conditionally build rwsem-xadd.o based on
CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM:
obj-$(CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK) += rwsem-spinlock.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM) += rwsem-xadd.o
So leaving just SMP is ok there.
>
> Besides that:
>
> Acked-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
>
Thanks,
Davidlohr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists