[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140607001819.GE4453@dastard>
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 10:18:19 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Pranith Kumar <pranith@...ech.edu>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, davidlohr@...com, mingo@...hat.com,
xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] cleanup: use bool as return type for
rwsem_is_locked
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 02:11:18PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> On 06/06/2014 01:53 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:35 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Now in general, I don't particularly like such superfluous changes, so
> >> unless you can show that GCC actually generates better code, I'd prefer
> >> to keep things as they are.
> >
> > Fixed and checked the assembly. It saves us 2 bytes of code, not much. I am not sure if that is worth it :(
> >
> > use bool as the return type for rwsem_is_locked() instead of int
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
....
Makes sense to me.
> I observed one other user of rwsem_is_locked() in xfs, change accordingly
>
> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 2 +-
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> index 768087b..9047eda 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ xfs_ilock_demote(
> }
>
> #if defined(DEBUG) || defined(XFS_WARN)
> -int
> +bool
> xfs_isilocked(
> xfs_inode_t *ip,
> uint lock_flags)
If you are going to change the return type to bool, then you should
also remove the manual "!!" conversions to a boolean return and let
the compiler do it in the most optimal way.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists