[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3egz0mxgd.fsf@intrepid.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 19:38:42 +0200
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: wan: wanxl.c: Cleaning up declaration of a while loop
Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se> writes:
> Unusual declaration of a while loop.
> However, believe you also want to make sure that the pointer is not NULL
Not really. The code is meant to do exactly what it currently does -
set variable desc and then check desc->stat.
All rx_descs are at this point already initialized and not NULL
(if desc was indeed NULL we better BUG*() or Oops on desc->stat access
instead of failing silently).
> --- a/drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c
> @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static inline void wanxl_tx_intr(port_t *port)
> static inline void wanxl_rx_intr(card_t *card)
> {
> desc_t *desc;
> - while (desc = &card->status->rx_descs[card->rx_in],
> + while (desc = &card->status->rx_descs[card->rx_in] &&
> desc->stat != PACKET_EMPTY) {
> if ((desc->stat & PACKET_PORT_MASK) > card->n_ports)
> pr_crit("%s: received packet for nonexistent port\n",
--
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists