[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1402104389.764014488@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 02:26:29 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Vince Weaver" <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 76/92] perf: Limit perf_event_attr::sample_period to
63 bits
3.2.60-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
commit 0819b2e30ccb93edf04876237b6205eef84ec8d2 upstream.
Vince reported that using a large sample_period (one with bit 63 set)
results in wreckage since while the sample_period is fundamentally
unsigned (negative periods don't make sense) the way we implement
things very much rely on signed logic.
So limit sample_period to 63 bits to avoid tripping over this.
Reported-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-p25fhunibl4y3qi0zuqmyf4b@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
kernel/events/core.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -6301,6 +6301,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
if (attr.freq) {
if (attr.sample_freq > sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate)
return -EINVAL;
+ } else {
+ if (attr.sample_period & (1ULL << 63))
+ return -EINVAL;
}
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists