[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140608165557.4d97eea4@annuminas.surriel.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2014 16:55:57 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mgorman@...e.de, mingo@...nel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH] numa,sched: fix load_to_imbalanced logic inversion
This function is supposed to return true if the new load imbalance
is worse than the old one. It didn't. I can only hope brown paper
bags are in style.
Now things converge much better on both the 4 node and 8 node systems.
I am not sure why this did not seem to impact specjbb performance on
the 4 node system, which is the system I have full-time access to.
This bug was introduced recently, with commit e63da036
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 6a90f67..7fb3e47 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1112,7 +1112,7 @@ static bool load_too_imbalanced(long orig_src_load, long orig_dst_load,
old_imb = orig_dst_load * 100 - orig_src_load * env->imbalance_pct;
/* Would this change make things worse? */
- return (old_imb > imb);
+ return (imb > old_imb);
}
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists