[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140607235307.GD22261@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2014 07:53:07 +0800
From: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"vincent.guittot@...aro.org" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <Dietmar.Eggemann@....com>,
len.brown@...el.com, jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/16] arm: topology: Define TC2 sched energy and
provide it to scheduler
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 02:13:05PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Leakage current typically gets higher with higher frequencies, but
> it's also highly process dependent AFAIK.
>
In general, you can assume leakage power ~ V^2.
> If switching power dissipation is the main factor in power use, then
> we can essentially assume that P ~ V^2, at the same frequency - and
> scales linearly with frequency - but real work performed also scales
> semi-linearly with frequency for many workloads, so that's an
> invariant for everything except highly memory bound workloads.
>
Agreed. Strictly, Energy ~ V^2.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists