[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140609115643.GZ5099@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 12:56:43 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Daniel Stone <daniels@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mfd: Add driver for Maxim 77802 Power Management IC
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 12:22:41PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On pon, 2014-06-09 at 11:37 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> > +static const struct max77802_irq_data max77802_irqs[] = {
> > + DECLARE_IRQ(MAX77802_PMICIRQ_PWRONF, PMIC_INT1, 1 << 0),
> > + DECLARE_IRQ(MAX77802_PMICIRQ_PWRONR, PMIC_INT1, 1 << 1),
> Why just not use two regmap_irq_chips (for PMIC and RTC blocks)
> replacing whole max77802-irq.c file?
If they share the same primary IRQ line something like what the arizona
drivers do should handle things well enough.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists